The original
self-evaluation I wrote was especially hard on myself.
So I scrapped it. I was
hard on myself because the video failed to live up to my imaginings in my mind.
In part because I was overly ambitious with the content, and in part because
the imagery wasn’t what I had initially hoped it would be. However, I realize
now that there are several things I did of which I am proud.
The first is
that I didn’t write a script. It was important to me not to sound scripted.
Yes, that meant I occasionally used filler words, or misspoke (several of the
misspeaking clips were re-recorded), but it meant I was able to (I think) sound
more enthusiastic and natural in my delivery while working from a set of notes
to keep me on track.
The second is
that my presentation doesn’t include a lot of text. Especially if I’m in a
classroom, I hate slides that have too much text on them because it’s not a
good presentation tool; I spend more time reading what’s on the slides or
writing everything before the next one comes up to listen. Although these make
for good study tools later, they’re ineffective to me as a classroom tool. That
aside, I also feel really clever for how I organized the images and linked them
to create the M in my final image. It’s cheesy, but I’m proud of it.
The third thing
is I covered what I wanted to cover. I feel I gave a pretty comprehensive
overview of motivation and how different people might apply varying techniques
to motivate a class. It is not as deep as I wanted, and there aren’t as many
anecdotes (I love my anecdotes) and self-reflective questions as I had
originally planned, but I at least touched on everything. Hopefully, the brief introduction
and the links inspired someone to go learn a little more and go digging.
Now, the things
of which I’m less proud.
First (if you
couldn’t tell from the blog post), going over time. I really had intended to
stick to the 6 minutes. Looking at it now, I could have cut sections from the
beginning and ended up with a decent video. At the same time, seeing that many
of my classmates also went over makes me feel a little better in that I’m not
alone in being overly ambitious.
Second,
agonizing over the length in both the video and blog post. I’m hard on myself.
Sometimes I forget not to be so vocal about that. I know apologizing doesn’t
help, that it can damage how people perceive you and your work, but I can’t
seem to stop. It is something my fiancé is working with me on because it annoys
him to no end. (Believe it or not, I am better than I used to be about it.)
Third, I didn’t
really summarize the presentation at the end. Yes, I returned to the learning
objectives and talked through what I hope had been gleaned, but that isn’t
really a summary.
The last thing
isn’t really here or there, and I’ll explain. I feel I may have spoken a bit
too quickly in the video. Ever since 10th grade when I had my first
speech class, the unanimous criticism was I speak too quickly. I was even told
senior year that I recited Hamlet’s third soliloquy astonishingly fast. The
more excited I get, the faster I talk. I have greatly improved in this, though.
In large part from talking with people and doing presentations all the time for
two years, followed by an MBA program and case competitions. I still speak
faster than many people. I accept this about myself and have come to accept
that there is a level of slow that I cannot do without losing my train of
thought. And that is one thing for which I’m done apologizing.
Overall, it isn’t
what I had imagined it would be, but I wouldn’t say it’s bad, either. You live
and you learn and hopefully improve along the way. I look forward to learning
from the feedback you all provide.


Teagan, I appreciate your honesty. I think we all had high expectations for our presentations and felt badly if the video wasn't what we envisioned. I know I did! I felt pretty bad for a few days, to be honest, but as I said in my self-evaluation and the lesson, we have to give ourselves a break. We must not let those small mistakes make us feel like failures. Also, I noticed that we, as over-achievers (lol), are used to people being overly critical of our work, so we pass that same thing to others and ultimately, to ourselves; however, it's not healthy. We beat ourselves up and at times, do the same to others when all of us are trying and learning. I think that was the most important thing I learned from this assignment. You think you didn't do as well as you could've done- I think you did a great job :)
ReplyDeleteAngela,
DeleteThank you for your kind comment. When I read it the first time, it really warmed my heart and made me smile. I think my problem is that I'm probably harder on myself than anyone else. There have been times I've looked at a grade I received on a paper and thought the professor had been far kinder than I would have been. But you're right, it's not healthy, and it is something that I need to rein in or I'll pass it on to my students and be that teacher with ridiculously high, unachievable standards; while I want to have high standards, I want them to be attainable. So I guess I have to start with myself, and there's no time like the present.
Thank you again for the kind words.
Hi Teagan,
ReplyDeleteI agree with Angela. I really enjoyed your learning module, and I do think you're being a bit too hard on yourself. I think that active reflection and constructive criticism are important components of effective teaching, but I also feel like teaching is kind of a trial and error process that requires us to look at critiques of our own work less as failings and more as opportunities for growth. There were so many great things happening in your module, and I think that you should be proud of your product.
Hi Teagen,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your reflection. I'm glad you scrapped the overly critical one and found some things to be proud of. I'm glad you also thought about things you can improve going forward. That's the most important thing. Summary at the end for example is a great thing to learn to do. So well done!